paper menu: be used to restaurant

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents -
Siblings -

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to restaurant 1.00
be find at restaurant 0.94
be find in some restaurant 0.89
be at diner 0.86
be at cheap restaurant 0.85
be used to inexpensive restaurant 0.84
be at chinese restaurant 0.82
be used to provide information to diner 0.81
be used to display of item available at restaurant 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at diner)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be at diner)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at diner)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be used to provide information to diner)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be find at restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be find in some restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(paper menu, be used to display of item available at restaurant)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(paper menu, be used to provide information to diner)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be used to provide information to diner)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to inexpensive restaurant)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(paper menu, be used to display of item available at restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be used to display of item available at restaurant)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to display of item available at restaurant)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to provide information to diner)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at cheap restaurant)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at diner)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(paper menu, be at chinese restaurant)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(paper menu, be used to restaurant)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(paper menu, be used to restaurant)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(paper menu, be used to restaurant)