paper towel: is insulators

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.69
, restroom
Weight: 0.66
, paper
Weight: 0.62
, towel
Weight: 0.61
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, tissue
Weight: 0.56
, bounty
Weight: 0.50
, beach towel
Weight: 0.40
, white paper
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is insulators 1.00
is good insulators 0.98
is insulator 0.85
is good insulator 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(paper, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(paper, is insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(towel, is good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(paper, is insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(towel, is good insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(paper, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(paper towel, is insulators)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(paper towel, is insulator)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper, is insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(towel, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper, is insulator)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(towel, is good insulator)