paper: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents newspaper
Weight: 0.68
, paper towel
Weight: 0.68
, raw material
Weight: 0.60
, publication
Weight: 0.60
Siblings toilet paper
Weight: 0.71
, white paper
Weight: 0.66
, paper currency
Weight: 0.64
, thesis
Weight: 0.61
, passport
Weight: 0.59

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is insulator 0.98
is heat insulator 0.94
is good insulators 0.87
is insulators 0.84
is best sound insulators 0.82
is sound insulators 0.82
is nonmagnetic 0.76
is nonmagnetic material 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(newspaper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paper towel, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulators)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(newspaper, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(newspaper, is good insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is good insulators)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(paper towel, is insulators)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(newspaper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(paper towel, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(paper towel, is good insulators)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(paper towel, is insulators)
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(paper, is good insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(paper, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(paper, is insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(paper, is insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(paper, is insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(paper, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(paper, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(newspaper, is good insulator)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulators)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(newspaper, is good insulator)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(paper towel, is insulators)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(paper, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(paper towel, is good insulators)