paralegal: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents job
Weight: 0.61
, person
Weight: 0.60
, office worker
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.57
, attorney
Weight: 0.57
Siblings accountant
Weight: 0.34
, defense attorney
Weight: 0.34
, clerk
Weight: 0.34
, counselor
Weight: 0.33
, solicitor
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid 0.96
get paid little 0.93
is paid little 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(defense attorney, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(counselor, get paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(counselor, is paid)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(counselor, is paid little)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(counselor, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(counselor, get paid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(counselor, is paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(counselor, is paid)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(defense attorney, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(defense attorney, get paid)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(counselor, get paid little) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(counselor, get paid little)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(accountant, get paid)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(paralegal, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(paralegal, get paid little)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(paralegal, is paid)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(paralegal, get paid little)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(paralegal, get paid little)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(paralegal, is paid little)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(paralegal, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(counselor, get paid)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(counselor, is paid)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(counselor, get paid little)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(counselor, is paid little)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(defense attorney, get paid)
...