accountant: get paid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cpa
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
get paid 1.00
is paid well 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, get paid)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(accountant, get paid)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, get paid)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(paralegal, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(accountant, get paid)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(accountant, is paid well)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(accountant, is paid well)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(accountant, is paid well)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(paralegal, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(accountant, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)