accountant: is paid well

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.63
, specialist
Weight: 0.63
, financial institution
Weight: 0.63
, department
Weight: 0.60
, professional
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cpa
Weight: 0.53
, lawyer
Weight: 0.35
, stockbroker
Weight: 0.35
, banker
Weight: 0.34
, paralegal
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is paid well 1.00
get paid 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(accountant, is paid well)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(specialist, get paid)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(paralegal, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, get paid)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(specialist, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(accountant, is paid well)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(lawyer, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(lawyer, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(paralegal, get paid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(paralegal, get paid)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(accountant, is paid well)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(accountant, get paid)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(accountant, get paid)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(accountant, get paid)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(accountant, get paid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(accountant, is paid well)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(paralegal, get paid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(lawyer, get paid)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(accountant, is paid well) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(specialist, get paid)