park: be important to community

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents location
Weight: 0.67
, playground
Weight: 0.67
, site
Weight: 0.66
, attraction
Weight: 0.66
, property
Weight: 0.63
Siblings central park
Weight: 0.89
, yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.80
, death valley
Weight: 0.68
, joshua tree
Weight: 0.67
, walt disney world
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to community 1.00
be good for community 0.94
help community 0.92
be divided in community state 0.83
help communities 0.83
be important in society 0.83
be important to society 0.83
be important to people of city 0.82
be important to people 0.82
have considered positive influences on community health departments 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(property, be important to society)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(property, be important in society)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(property, be important to society)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(property, be important in society)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(property, be important to society)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(property, be important to society)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be important to community)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(property, be important in society)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be important to community)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(central park, be important to people of city)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people of city)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(central park, be important to people)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(central park, be important to people)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(park, be important to community)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(park, be good for community)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be good for community)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(park, be good for community)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(park, help communities)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(park, help communities)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(park, be important to people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(park, be important to people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(park, help communities)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(park, be important to people)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(park, be good for community)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to people)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(park, have considered positive influences on community health departments)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(park, help communities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, be important to community)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(property, be important in society)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(property, be important to society)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people of city)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(central park, be important to people)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(property, be important in society)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(park, be important to community)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(property, be important to society)