partition: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents structure
Weight: 0.59
, application
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.56
Siblings computer disk
Weight: 0.33
, fragmentation
Weight: 0.32
, manila folder
Weight: 0.32
, attachment
Weight: 0.31
, computer architecture
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful 0.99
be useful in computer 0.85
is valuable 0.83
be important to gilgamesh 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(partition, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(partition, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(application, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important to gilgamesh)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(application, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(fragmentation, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(application, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(partition, is useful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(issue, be important to gilgamesh) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(partition, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(fragmentation, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(fragmentation, is useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(computer architecture, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(computer architecture, be useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(partition, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(partition, be useful in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(partition, be useful in computer)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(partition, be useful in computer)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(partition, be useful in computer)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(partition, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fragmentation, is useful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(computer architecture, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(partition, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(issue, be important to gilgamesh)