partner: start look alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
start look alike 1.00
start look 0.91
tend look alike 0.87
tend look 0.78
look similar 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(spouse, start look alike)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(spouse, start look)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(spouse, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(spouse, start look alike)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(spouse, start look)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(spouse, start look)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(partner, start look alike)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(partner, start look)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(partner, start look)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(partner, start look)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(partner, tend look alike)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(partner, tend look alike)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(partner, tend look)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(partner, tend look alike)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(partner, tend look)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(partner, start look)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(partner, tend look)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(partner, tend look alike)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(partner, look similar)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(partner, look similar)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(partner, look similar)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partner, tend look)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(partner, look similar)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(partner, start look alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partner, start look alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(spouse, start look)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spouse, start look alike)