partner: tend look alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents family member
Weight: 0.71
, attorney
Weight: 0.65
, manager
Weight: 0.63
, user
Weight: 0.58
Siblings law firm
Weight: 0.68
, owner
Weight: 0.67
, representative
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
, spouse
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
tend look alike 1.00
tend look 0.95
start look alike 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(spouse, start look alike)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(spouse, start look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(spouse, start look alike)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(partner, tend look alike)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(partner, tend look)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partner, tend look)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(partner, tend look)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(partner, start look alike)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(partner, tend look)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(partner, start look alike)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(partner, start look alike)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(partner, start look alike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(partner, tend look alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(partner, tend look alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(partner, tend look alike) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(spouse, start look alike)