partnership: be useful to organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, relationship
Weight: 0.61
, strategy
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.58
, commitment
Weight: 0.58
Siblings friendship
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.33
, merger
Weight: 0.33
, acquisition
Weight: 0.33
, pact
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful to organization 1.00
be to organization important 0.92
be important to organization 0.92
be to organization 0.89
be helpful 0.79
be valuable 0.77
is valuable 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commitment, be to organization important)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(commitment, be to organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(relationship, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(commitment, be to organization)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(commitment, be to organization important)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(relationship, be helpful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(relationship, be helpful)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be to organization)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(commitment, be to organization important)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(contract, be valuable)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(friendship, is valuable)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(commitment, be to organization important)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(commitment, be to organization)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(relationship, be helpful)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(friendship, is valuable)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(friendship, is valuable)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(contract, be valuable)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(contract, be valuable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(partnership, be useful to organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(commitment, be to organization)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(commitment, be to organization important)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(relationship, be helpful)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(friendship, is valuable)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(contract, be valuable)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(commitment, be to organization)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(commitment, be to organization important)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(relationship, be helpful)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(partnership, be useful to organization)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)