strategy: be important to organization

Related concepts

Parents	method Weight: 0.67 , objective Weight: 0.65 , plan Weight: 0.65 , policy Weight: 0.60
Siblings	approach Weight: 0.70 , planning Weight: 0.69 , framework Weight: 0.68 , marketing Weight: 0.65 , consolidation Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be important to organization	1.00
be important in organization	1.00
be needed in organization	0.92
contribute to organization success	0.85
be important to business organizations	0.84
help organization achieving	0.84
be to organizations	0.81
be to nonprofit organizations	0.80
be to other organizations	0.80
be important in counselling	0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(objective, be important to business organizations) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(policy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(policy, be needed in organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(policy, be important to organization)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Plausible(policy, be important in organization)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(policy, be needed in organization)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(objective, be important to business organizations)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(objective, be important to business organizations)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in organization)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(policy, be important to organization)

0.13

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(policy, be needed in organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to nonprofit organizations)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to other organizations)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(marketing, help organization achieving)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(marketing, be to organizations)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.56

Plausible(policy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.46

Plausible(policy, be needed in organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.95

Plausible(objective, be important to business organizations) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(planning, contribute to organization success) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(planning, contribute to organization success)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(marketing, help organization achieving) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(marketing, help organization achieving)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(marketing, be to organizations) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(marketing, be to organizations)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

Remarkable(marketing, be to other organizations) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(marketing, be to other organizations)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

Remarkable(framework, be important in counselling) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Plausible(framework, be important in counselling)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(marketing, be to nonprofit organizations) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Plausible(marketing, be to nonprofit organizations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Salient(strategy, be important to organization)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.86

Salient(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(policy, be important to organization)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(policy, be important in organization)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(objective, be important to business organizations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(marketing, be to organizations)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(planning, contribute to organization success)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(marketing, help organization achieving)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Typical(marketing, be to other organizations)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Typical(framework, be important in counselling)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(marketing, be to nonprofit organizations)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(policy, be important to organization)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(policy, be needed in organization)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Typical(policy, be important in organization)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.63

Typical(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(objective, be important to business organizations)