policy: be important in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in organization 1.00
be important to organization 1.00
be important part of hipaa 0.78
be important in work 0.77
be important in government 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(policy, be important in organization)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important to organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(strategy, be important to organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in organization)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(policy, be important in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important to organization)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(policy, be important to organization)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(policy, be important to organization)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(policy, be important to organization)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important part of hipaa)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in work)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in government)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(policy, be important in work)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(policy, be important part of hipaa)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(policy, be important in government)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(policy, be important in work)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in work)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in government)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(policy, be important in government)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(policy, be important part of hipaa)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(policy, be important part of hipaa)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(policy, be important in organization)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(policy, be important in organization) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(strategy, be important to organization)