pdf: is best

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents web page
Weight: 0.63
, web site
Weight: 0.59
, format
Weight: 0.57
, information
Weight: 0.57
, document
Weight: 0.57
Siblings wikipedia
Weight: 0.35
, web browser
Weight: 0.34
, web
Weight: 0.34
, google
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best 1.00
has quality good 0.76
has quality better 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(web browser, is best)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(google, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(web, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(web browser, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(web browser, is best)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(web, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(web, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(wikipedia, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(google, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(google, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(google, has quality better) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(google, has quality better)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pdf, is best)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(pdf, has quality better)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(pdf, has quality good)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(pdf, has quality better)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pdf, has quality better)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pdf, has quality better)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(pdf, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pdf, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pdf, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(web, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(wikipedia, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(web browser, is best)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(google, has quality better)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pdf, is best) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(google, has quality good)