peach: taste good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents color
Weight: 0.69
, fruit
Weight: 0.67
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.65
, food
Weight: 0.62
, crop
Weight: 0.61
Siblings nectarine
Weight: 0.60
, crab apple
Weight: 0.37
, strawberry
Weight: 0.37
, pear tree
Weight: 0.37
, pear
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
taste good 1.00
taste different 0.93
taste mealy 0.82
taste like nail polish 0.80
smell bad 0.79
has quality good 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(peach, taste good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(peach, taste good)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(color, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(peach, taste good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(peach, taste good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(food, taste different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(color, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(color, has quality good)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fruit, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(food, taste different)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(food, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(pear tree, smell bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(nectarine, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(strawberry, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(food, taste different)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(peach, taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Plausible(food, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(peach, taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(color, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(peach, taste good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(fruit, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(peach, taste good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(pear tree, smell bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(pear tree, smell bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(nectarine, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(nectarine, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(strawberry, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(strawberry, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(peach, taste good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(peach, taste like nail polish)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste like nail polish)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(peach, taste like nail polish)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(peach, taste like nail polish)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(peach, has quality good)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(peach, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(peach, has quality good)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(peach, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(peach, taste good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(pear tree, smell bad)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(nectarine, has quality good)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(strawberry, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(food, taste different)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(fruit, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(color, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(peach, taste good)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(food, has quality good)