pennsylvania: was named

Related concepts

Parents	wisconsin Weight: 0.60 , new york Weight: 0.59 , new york city Weight: 0.59 , new england Weight: 0.57
Siblings	west virginia Weight: 0.76 , massachusetts Weight: 0.63 , indiana Weight: 0.60 , ohio Weight: 0.35 , connecticut Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was named	1.00
was named pennsylvania	0.77
was found	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(new england, was found) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was named)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was named)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(new york, was found)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(new england, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.08

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(new england, was found)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(new york, was found)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(west virginia, was found)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was found)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(connecticut, was named)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Remarkable(massachusetts, was found)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(new england, was found) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was named)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(new york, was found) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was named)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(connecticut, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(connecticut, was named)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

Remarkable(massachusetts, was found) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(massachusetts, was found)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(connecticut, was found) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Plausible(connecticut, was found)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

Remarkable(west virginia, was found) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(west virginia, was found)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was named)

Similarity expansion

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was named pennsylvania)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named pennsylvania)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was found)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.21

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was named pennsylvania)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was named pennsylvania)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(pennsylvania, was found)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.66

¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, was found)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was found)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.65

Salient(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.41

Plausible(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(pennsylvania, was named)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(new york, was found)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(new england, was found)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(connecticut, was named)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(massachusetts, was found)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(connecticut, was found)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(west virginia, was found)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.19

¬ Typical(new york, was found)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(pennsylvania, was named) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(new england, was found)