peru: have catholic populations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.67
, south america
Weight: 0.59
, region
Weight: 0.57
, location
Weight: 0.55
Siblings puerto rico
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36
, colombia
Weight: 0.36
, argentina
Weight: 0.36
, brazil
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have catholic populations 1.00
have populations 0.90
have population 0.83
have large population 0.81
have japanese population 0.80
have large japanese population 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have japanese population)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(brazil, have population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(brazil, have population)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(brazil, have japanese population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(brazil, have japanese population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(peru, have catholic populations)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(peru, have populations)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(peru, have population)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(peru, have populations)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(peru, have japanese population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(peru, have populations)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(peru, have catholic populations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(peru, have catholic populations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brazil, have population)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(peru, have catholic populations) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(brazil, have japanese population)