peru: have populations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents latin america
Weight: 0.67
, south america
Weight: 0.59
, region
Weight: 0.57
, location
Weight: 0.55
Siblings puerto rico
Weight: 0.37
, saudi arabia
Weight: 0.36
, colombia
Weight: 0.36
, argentina
Weight: 0.36
, brazil
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have populations 1.00
have catholic populations 0.90
have population 0.89
have large population 0.86
have large japanese population 0.78
have japanese population 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have japanese population)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.04
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(brazil, have population)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(brazil, have population)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(brazil, have population)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(brazil, have japanese population)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(brazil, have japanese population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(peru, have populations)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(peru, have catholic populations)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peru, have population)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(peru, have population)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(peru, have large population)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(peru, have large japanese population)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peru, have populations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(peru, have populations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(brazil, have population)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(peru, have populations)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(brazil, have japanese population)