pet: get in foopets

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.67
, friend
Weight: 0.64
, creature
Weight: 0.64
Siblings hamster
Weight: 0.74
, guinea pig
Weight: 0.71
, monkey
Weight: 0.70
, snake
Weight: 0.69
, dog
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
get in foopets 1.00
know make 0.80
be good for people 0.77
be good for us 0.77
make us happy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(pet, get in foopets)

Similarity expansion

0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(pet, be good for us)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(pet, be good for people)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(pet, be good for people)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(pet, be good for us)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(pet, be good for people)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(pet, be good for us)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(pet, be good for people)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(pet, be good for us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Salient(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(pet, get in foopets)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(pet, get in foopets) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pet, get in foopets)