pharmaceuticals: is harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents industry
Weight: 0.48
, environment
Weight: 0.28
Siblings banking industry
Weight: 0.32
, automobile industry
Weight: 0.32
, chemicals
Weight: 0.31
, electronics
Weight: 0.31
, semiconductor
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is harmful 1.00
be harmful 0.99
be harmful for environment 0.91
be in cigarettes harmful 0.84
be beneficial 0.80
is toxic 0.79
is dangerous 0.79
is hazardous 0.79
be toxic to human 0.79
harm animals 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be toxic to human)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be in cigarettes harmful)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, is toxic)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, is dangerous)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be beneficial)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be harmful)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(chemicals, be harmful for environment) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chemicals, be beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be beneficial)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(chemicals, be in cigarettes harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be in cigarettes harmful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chemicals, is dangerous) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(chemicals, is dangerous)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(chemicals, is toxic) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(chemicals, is toxic)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(chemicals, be toxic to human) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(chemicals, be toxic to human)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(pharmaceuticals, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pharmaceuticals, is harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(chemicals, be harmful for environment)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(chemicals, be harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(chemicals, be beneficial)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chemicals, be toxic to human)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(chemicals, be in cigarettes harmful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chemicals, is dangerous)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(pharmaceuticals, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(chemicals, is toxic)