phone: be better than laptops

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than laptops 1.00
be different from phones 0.79
have phones 0.78
be different from phones used 0.78
be different from phones used ago 0.76
be different from phones used long ago 0.76
have dumb phones 0.76
be called phones 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(phone, be better than laptops)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.52
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(mobile phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(phone, be better than laptops)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(phone, be better than laptops)

Similarity expansion

0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(phone, have dumb phones)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(phone, have dumb phones)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(phone, be different from phones used long ago)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(phone, have dumb phones)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(phone, have dumb phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Salient(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(phone, be better than laptops)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(phone, be better than laptops)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be better than laptops)