phone: were helpful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mobile phone
Weight: 0.79
, cell phone
Weight: 0.75
, electronic device
Weight: 0.65
, personal computer
Weight: 0.62
Siblings cellular phone
Weight: 0.81
, phone book
Weight: 0.70
, blackberry
Weight: 0.68
, headset
Weight: 0.58
, thunderbolt
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
were helpful 1.00
is helpful 0.95
be useful 0.86
is useful 0.86
be helpful invention 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cell phone, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cell phone, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cell phone, be useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(cell phone, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(electronic device, is useful)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, be helpful invention)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(electronic device, is useful)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(mobile phone, is useful)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, be useful)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(cell phone, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(electronic device, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(phone, were helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(cell phone, be useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(phone, were helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(mobile phone, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(phone, were helpful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(cell phone, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(phone, were helpful)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(mobile phone, be helpful invention) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(phone, were helpful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(phone, were helpful)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(phone, is helpful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(phone, is helpful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(phone, be useful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(phone, is helpful)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(phone, is useful)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(phone, is helpful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(phone, be useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(phone, be useful)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(phone, is useful)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(phone, be helpful invention)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(phone, is useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(phone, be useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(phone, is useful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(phone, be helpful invention)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(phone, be helpful invention)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(phone, be helpful invention)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(phone, were helpful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be useful)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cell phone, is useful)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be helpful invention)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cell phone, be useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(cell phone, is useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(mobile phone, is useful)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(electronic device, is useful)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(phone, were helpful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(mobile phone, be helpful invention)