photo: be in white

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents image
Weight: 0.64
, piece
Weight: 0.64
, keepsake
Weight: 0.60
, collage
Weight: 0.60
Siblings tag
Weight: 0.58
, headshot
Weight: 0.54
, caption
Weight: 0.51
, mug
Weight: 0.50
, photograph
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in white 1.00
be from white 0.97
be in black 0.92
has color white 0.92
were black in 1960 0.89
has color black 0.88
appear white 0.87
look better in white 0.85
has color blue 0.84
be from space in black 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(piece, appear white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photo, be in white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(piece, appear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(piece, appear white)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in white)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(headshot, be in white)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(headshot, be in black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photograph, look better in white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(headshot, has color white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(headshot, has color black)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(caption, has color white)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(piece, appear white)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(photo, be in white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(photograph, be in white)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(photograph, be in white)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(headshot, be in white)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(headshot, be in white)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(caption, has color white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(caption, has color white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(headshot, has color white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(headshot, has color white)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(headshot, be in black)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(headshot, be in black)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(photograph, be in black)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(photograph, be in black)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(headshot, has color black)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(headshot, has color black)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(photograph, look better in white)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(photograph, look better in white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(photo, be in white)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photo, be from white)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photo, be in black)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photo, has color white)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(photo, be from white)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(photo, be from white)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photo, were black in 1960)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photo, has color black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(photo, be in black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(photo, be in black)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(photo, look better in white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(photo, has color white)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photo, has color white)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(photo, has color blue)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(photo, were black in 1960)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(photo, were black in 1960)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(photo, has color black)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(photo, has color black)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photo, look better in white)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(photo, look better in white)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(photo, has color blue)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(photo, has color blue)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(photo, be from white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in black)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(photo, were black in 1960)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in white)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(photo, has color white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(photo, has color black)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(photo, has color blue)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photo, be in white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(piece, appear white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(photograph, be in white)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(headshot, be in white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photograph, be in black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(headshot, be in black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(caption, has color white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(headshot, has color white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(headshot, has color black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photograph, look better in white)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(photo, be in white)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(piece, appear white)