photograph: be in black

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents artifact
Weight: 0.67
, portrait
Weight: 0.67
, painting
Weight: 0.64
, image
Weight: 0.61
Siblings digital camera
Weight: 0.73
, shot
Weight: 0.59
, photo
Weight: 0.38
, artwork
Weight: 0.35
, sketch
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in black 1.00
be in white 0.92
look better in black 0.85
look better in white 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in black)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(photo, be in white)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(photo, look better in white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(photo, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(photo, be in black)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(photo, be in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(photo, be in white)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(photo, look better in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(photo, look better in black)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(photo, look better in white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(photo, look better in white)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(photograph, be in black)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(photograph, be in white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photograph, look better in black)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(photograph, be in white)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(photograph, be in white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in white)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photograph, look better in white)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(photograph, look better in black)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(photograph, look better in black)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(photograph, look better in white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(photograph, look better in white)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(photograph, look better in black)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(photograph, look better in white)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(photograph, be in black)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photo, be in black)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(photo, be in white)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photo, look better in black)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(photograph, be in black) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(photo, look better in white)