photography: be related to technology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.67
, art
Weight: 0.65
, medium
Weight: 0.64
, invention
Weight: 0.64
, passion
Weight: 0.62
Siblings painting
Weight: 0.35
, watercolor
Weight: 0.35
, calligraphy
Weight: 0.34
, needlework
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to technology 1.00
be related 0.83
was created before technology 0.83
be related to world 0.81
be related in art 0.79
differentiate from technology 0.78
be related to life 0.78
be related to government 0.77
be related to physics 0.76
be related to economy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photography, be related to technology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(medium, be related in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photography, be related to technology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(art, be related to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photography, be related to technology)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(art, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(art, be related to world)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(medium, be related in art)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(art, be related to world)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(medium, be related in art)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(art, be related)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(art, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to technology)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(art, be related to world) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to technology)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(medium, be related in art) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to technology)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(photography, be related to technology)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(photography, be related)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(photography, be related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(photography, be related)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(photography, be related to physics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(photography, be related to physics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(photography, be related to physics)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to physics)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(photography, be related to technology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(medium, be related in art)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(art, be related to world)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(art, be related)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(art, be related to world)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(photography, be related to technology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(medium, be related in art)