pig: be kill for food

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wild animal
Weight: 0.72
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, pet
Weight: 0.65
, creature
Weight: 0.63
, mammal
Weight: 0.60
Siblings guinea pig
Weight: 0.73
, piglet
Weight: 0.67
, rabbit
Weight: 0.38
, cow
Weight: 0.38
, goat
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be kill for food 1.00
be used to kill for food 1.00
be kill for meat 0.90
kill person 0.88
be used to food 0.83
hunt for food 0.80
wants to food 0.79
be eat by person 0.78
be eat 0.77
eat 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, be kill for food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, be kill for food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, be kill for food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, be kill for food)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, be kill for food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creature, eat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(animal, be used to food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(animal, eat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(mammal, eat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(creature, eat)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(animal, eat)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mammal, eat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(animal, be used to food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(cow, eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(cow, be eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(cow, be kill for meat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(goat, wants to food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(goat, eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(animal, be used to kill for food)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(animal, be used to food)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(mammal, eat)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(animal, eat)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(creature, eat)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pig, be kill for food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(cow, be kill for meat)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(cow, be kill for meat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(goat, wants to food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(goat, wants to food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(rabbit, eat)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(goat, eat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(goat, eat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(cow, be eat)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(cow, be eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(cow, eat)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cow, eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(pig, be kill for food)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(pig, be eat by person)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(pig, be eat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(pig, be eat by person)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(pig, be eat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pig, eat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(pig, eat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pig, eat)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(pig, be eat by person)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(pig, be eat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(pig, eat)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(pig, be eat)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(pig, be eat by person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(pig, be kill for food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be used to food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cow, be kill for meat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(goat, eat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(rabbit, eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(cow, be eat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(goat, wants to food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cow, eat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(animal, be used to kill for food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(animal, be used to food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(creature, eat)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(mammal, eat)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(pig, be kill for food)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(animal, eat)