pike: be at river

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents predator
Weight: 0.58
, fish
Weight: 0.56
, county
Weight: 0.51
, man
Weight: 0.48
, dish
Weight: 0.48
Siblings trout
Weight: 0.34
, chinook salmon
Weight: 0.34
, catfish
Weight: 0.34
, herring
Weight: 0.34
, flounder
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at river 1.00
be find in river 0.96
be at lake river and ocean 0.95
be at fresh water lake and river 0.94
swim in river 0.91
requires go to river or sea 0.91
be at lake 0.90
be at in lake 0.90
requires go to lake 0.87
fish in lake 0.87

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pike, be at river)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pike, be at river)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(fish, be at in lake)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fish, requires go to lake)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(catfish, be at river)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fish, be at in lake)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pike, be at river)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(fish, requires go to lake)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pike, be at river)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(catfish, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(catfish, be at river)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(pike, be at river)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(pike, be at fresh water lake and river)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(pike, be at fresh water lake and river)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(pike, be at lake)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(pike, be at lake)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at fresh water lake and river)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at lake)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(pike, be at lake)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(pike, be at fresh water lake and river)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at river)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pike, be at river)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fish, requires go to lake)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(catfish, be at river)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fish, requires go to lake)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Typical(pike, be at river)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(fish, be at in lake)