pizza: be better than cereal

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.68
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.68
, frozen food
Weight: 0.66
, junk food
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.37
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, burrito
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.36
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than cereal 1.00
be better than food 0.83
be better than healthy food 0.81
be better than pizza 0.79
be considered as snack food 0.78
be cheaper than healthy food 0.78
be considered as popular snack food 0.77
be cheaper than food 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(junk food, be better than food)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be cheaper than food)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be considered as popular snack food)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be considered as snack food)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(junk food, be better than food)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(junk food, be better than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(junk food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(fast food, be cheaper than food)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(hamburger, be better than pizza)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(sandwich, be considered as popular snack food)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be considered as popular snack food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(pizza, be better than cereal)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(sandwich, be considered as snack food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(hamburger, be better than pizza)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(sandwich, be considered as popular snack food)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than healthy food)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(fast food, be cheaper than food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than food)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(junk food, be better than healthy food)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(pizza, be better than cereal)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(junk food, be cheaper than healthy food)