pizza: be eaten in triangles

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fast food
Weight: 0.68
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.68
, frozen food
Weight: 0.66
, junk food
Weight: 0.66
, meal
Weight: 0.66
Siblings hamburger
Weight: 0.37
, sandwich
Weight: 0.37
, burrito
Weight: 0.36
, taco bell
Weight: 0.36
, cheeseburger
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be eaten in triangles 1.00
be cut in triangles 0.90
cut in triangles 0.89
taste better in triangles 0.88
taste cut into triangles 0.88
cut into triangles 0.88
is eaten 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(cheeseburger, is eaten)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(sandwich, cut into triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(sandwich, be cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(sandwich, cut in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(sandwich, cut in triangles)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(sandwich, taste better in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(cheeseburger, is eaten) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(cheeseburger, is eaten)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(sandwich, taste cut into triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(pizza, be eaten in triangles)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pizza, be eaten in triangles)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(sandwich, be cut in triangles)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut in triangles)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(sandwich, cut into triangles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste better in triangles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(sandwich, taste cut into triangles)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(pizza, be eaten in triangles) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cheeseburger, is eaten)