play hockey: requires ice skate

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.62
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.39
, hockey player
Weight: 0.38
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.38
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.38
, hockey
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
requires ice skate 1.00
ice skate 0.99
causes skate on ice 0.99
requires buy ice skate 0.98
requires put on ice skate 0.98
requires learn how to ice skate 0.95
be ice 0.91
requires ice 0.91
requires learn to skate well 0.90
be play in ice rink 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(hockey, be ice)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(hockey player, ice skate)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(hockey player, ice skate)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(hockey, be ice)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(hockey, be ice)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(play hockey, causes skate on ice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires put on ice skate)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(play hockey, requires ice)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires ice)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(play hockey, requires ice)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires buy ice skate)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires learn how to ice skate)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires learn to skate well)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(play hockey, requires ice skate)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be play in ice rink)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(hockey player, ice skate)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(play hockey, requires ice skate)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(hockey, be ice)