playing: relate to science

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hobby
Weight: 0.58
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, action
Weight: 0.56
, intensity
Weight: 0.52
Siblings playing game
Weight: 0.36
, play
Weight: 0.36
, playing sport
Weight: 0.35
, play game
Weight: 0.34
, softball game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to science 1.00
be related to science 0.90
be related to math 0.79
relate to position 0.77
be important in physics 0.77
relate to purpose of god 0.76
be scientific 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(activity, relate to purpose of god)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(playing, relate to science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intensity, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(playing, relate to science)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(intensity, relate to position)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(playing, relate to science)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(intensity, relate to position)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(intensity, be important in physics)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(activity, relate to purpose of god)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(intensity, relate to position)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(intensity, be important in physics)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(activity, relate to purpose of god)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(activity, relate to purpose of god)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(playing, relate to science)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(intensity, be important in physics)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(playing, relate to science)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(intensity, relate to position)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(playing, relate to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(playing, relate to science)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(playing, be related to math)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(playing, be related to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(playing, be related to science)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(playing, be related to math)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(playing, be related to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playing, be related to science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(playing, be related to math)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(playing, be scientific)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(playing, be scientific)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(playing, be related to math)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(playing, be scientific)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(playing, be scientific)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(playing, relate to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intensity, relate to position)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(activity, relate to purpose of god)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(intensity, be important in physics)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(intensity, relate to position)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(activity, relate to purpose of god)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(playing, relate to science)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(intensity, be important in physics)