plea bargain: has quality bad

Related concepts

Parents	deal Weight: 0.65 , agreement Weight: 0.64 , case Weight: 0.61 , option Weight: 0.59 , thing Weight: 0.59
Siblings	court case Weight: 0.33 , compromise Weight: 0.33 , contract Weight: 0.33 , stock option Weight: 0.33 , cold case Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality bad	1.00
has quality good	0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(deal, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(plea bargain, has quality bad)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(plea bargain, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(deal, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(agreement, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(deal, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(agreement, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Remarkable(compromise, has quality bad)

0.12

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Remarkable(compromise, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

¬ Remarkable(stock option, has quality good)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.64

Plausible(deal, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.63

Plausible(agreement, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

Remarkable(compromise, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(compromise, has quality bad)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

Remarkable(contract, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

Remarkable(compromise, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(compromise, has quality good)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.74

Remarkable(stock option, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality good)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

Remarkable(stock option, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(stock option, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Salient(plea bargain, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(plea bargain, has quality good)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Plausible(plea bargain, has quality good)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(plea bargain, has quality good)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.25

Salient(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.29

Plausible(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Typical(plea bargain, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(deal, has quality bad)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(compromise, has quality bad)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Typical(compromise, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(stock option, has quality bad)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(stock option, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Typical(deal, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.50

Typical(plea bargain, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Typical(agreement, has quality good)