polar bear: is zoo

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bear
Weight: 0.79
, brown bear
Weight: 0.75
, mammal
Weight: 0.75
, arctic
Weight: 0.72
Siblings arctic fox
Weight: 0.74
, black bear
Weight: 0.41
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.39
, panda bear
Weight: 0.38
, moose
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zoo 1.00
go to zoo 0.98
eat cubs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(polar bear, is zoo)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bear, go to zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(polar bear, is zoo)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bear, eat cubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(polar bear, is zoo)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(bear, is zoo)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(bear, go to zoo)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(bear, eat cubs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(bear, eat cubs)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(bear, is zoo)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(bear, go to zoo)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, eat cubs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(panda bear, is zoo)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(polar bear, is zoo)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(bear, go to zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(polar bear, is zoo)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(bear, eat cubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(polar bear, is zoo)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(panda bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(panda bear, is zoo)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
Remarkable(grizzly bear, eat cubs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, eat cubs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(polar bear, is zoo)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(polar bear, go to zoo)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(polar bear, go to zoo)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(polar bear, go to zoo)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, go to zoo)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(polar bear, eat cubs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(polar bear, eat cubs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, eat cubs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(polar bear, eat cubs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(polar bear, is zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bear, eat cubs)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is zoo)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bear, go to zoo)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, eat cubs)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(panda bear, is zoo)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(bear, is zoo)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(bear, go to zoo)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(polar bear, is zoo) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(bear, eat cubs)