policeman: is math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38
, young man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is math 1.00
is strong math 0.91
is math answers 0.90
is strong math answers 0.87
use math catching 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(policeman, is math)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(policeman, is math answers)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(policeman, is math answers)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is math answers)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(policeman, use math catching)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(policeman, use math catching)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(policeman, use math catching)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(policeman, is math answers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is strong math)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is strong math answers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(policeman, is strong math answers)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(policeman, is strong math)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(policeman, is strong math answers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(policeman, use math catching)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(policeman, is strong math)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(policeman, is strong math answers)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(policeman, is strong math)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(policeman, is math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(policeman, is math)