policeman: is strong math

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.79
, police
Weight: 0.67
, person
Weight: 0.64
, witness
Weight: 0.63
Siblings police officer
Weight: 0.39
, old man
Weight: 0.38
, young man
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is strong math 1.00
is strong math answers 0.92
is math 0.91
is math answers 0.83
use math catching 0.80
is strong 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(old man, is strong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(old man, is strong) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(old man, is strong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(policeman, is strong math)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(policeman, is math)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(policeman, is math)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(policeman, is math)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(policeman, is math answers)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is strong math)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(policeman, is strong math)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(policeman, is strong math) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(old man, is strong)