policy: be in workplace important

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.65
, strategy
Weight: 0.63
, recommendation
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.60
Siblings interest rate
Weight: 0.67
, bill
Weight: 0.67
, proposal
Weight: 0.66
, report
Weight: 0.65
, prohibition
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in workplace 1.00
be in workplace important 1.00
be in workplace 0.97
be important in workplace pdf 0.88
be important in workplace uk 0.88
be important in environment 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(policy, be in workplace important)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(strategy, be important in environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(strategy, be important in environment)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(policy, be in workplace important)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(policy, be in workplace)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in workplace)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(policy, be in workplace)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(policy, be in workplace)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(policy, be important in workplace)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in workplace pdf)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(policy, be in workplace)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(policy, be important in workplace uk)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(policy, be important in workplace)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in workplace)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(policy, be important in workplace pdf)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(policy, be important in workplace uk)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(policy, be important in workplace pdf)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(policy, be important in workplace uk)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in workplace pdf)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(policy, be important in workplace uk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(policy, be in workplace important)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
Typical(policy, be in workplace important)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(strategy, be important in environment)