poll: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents issue
Weight: 0.60
, tool
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.57
, statistics
Weight: 0.56
Siblings voting
Weight: 0.31
, political party
Weight: 0.31
, index
Weight: 0.31
, business activity
Weight: 0.30
, national convention
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality good 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(poll, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(index, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(voting, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(poll, has quality wrong)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(voting, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(voting, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(index, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(index, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(poll, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(poll, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(poll, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(poll, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Salient(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(poll, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(voting, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(index, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(poll, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)