polyp: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.57
, abnormality
Weight: 0.57
, growth
Weight: 0.56
, condition
Weight: 0.56
, cause
Weight: 0.51
Siblings tumor
Weight: 0.34
, thyroid problem
Weight: 0.34
, atrial fibrillation
Weight: 0.34
, cystic fibrosis
Weight: 0.34
, cyst
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality worse 0.87
has quality definition 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(cyst, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(tumor, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(tumor, has quality bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(cyst, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(cyst, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(polyp, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(polyp, has quality worse)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality worse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(polyp, has quality worse)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(polyp, has quality worse)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(polyp, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(cystic fibrosis, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(cyst, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(tumor, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(polyp, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(atrial fibrillation, has quality bad)