porcelain: was important in china

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, surface
Weight: 0.57
, substance
Weight: 0.55
Siblings vase
Weight: 0.35
, enamel
Weight: 0.34
, pottery
Weight: 0.34
, teapot
Weight: 0.33
, decoration
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important in china 1.00
was used in china 0.95
be called china 0.93
was important in ancient china 0.93
be different from porcelain 0.81
be called porcelain 0.80
was important to chinese 0.80
be different from old porcelain 0.79
be different from original porcelain 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(pottery, be called china)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(pottery, was important in ancient china)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(pottery, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in china)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(pottery, be called china)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(pottery, be called china)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(pottery, was important in ancient china)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(pottery, was important in ancient china)

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(porcelain, was important in china)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(porcelain, was used in china)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(porcelain, was used in china)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(porcelain, be called china)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(porcelain, was used in china)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(porcelain, be called china)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(porcelain, be called china)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(porcelain, be different from porcelain)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(porcelain, be called porcelain)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(porcelain, be called porcelain)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(porcelain, was important to chinese)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(porcelain, be different from old porcelain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(porcelain, be different from original porcelain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(porcelain, be called porcelain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(porcelain, be different from porcelain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(porcelain, be different from porcelain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, be called china)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(porcelain, was important to chinese)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(porcelain, be different from old porcelain)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(porcelain, be different from original porcelain)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important to chinese)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(porcelain, be different from old porcelain)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(porcelain, be different from original porcelain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in ancient china)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was used in china)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important to chinese)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, be different from original porcelain)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, be different from old porcelain)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, be different from porcelain)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, be called porcelain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Plausible(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(porcelain, was important in china)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pottery, be called china)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in china)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(porcelain, was important in china)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(pottery, was important in ancient china)