pork: be good for dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for dogs 1.00
be bad for dogs 0.97
be bad for cats 0.89
make dogs sick 0.87
is dog food 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pork, be good for dogs)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pork, be good for dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pork, be good for dogs)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(pork, be good for dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(pork, be good for dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(pork, be bad for cats)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(pork, be bad for cats)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(pork, be bad for dogs)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(pork, be bad for cats)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(pork, be bad for dogs)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(pork, be bad for dogs)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pork, make dogs sick)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pork, make dogs sick)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pork, make dogs sick)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pork, is dog food)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pork, is dog food)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(pork, be bad for cats)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pork, is dog food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(pork, be bad for dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(pork, make dogs sick)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Salient(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(pork, be good for dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Typical(pork, be good for dogs) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for cats)