pork: is dog food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
is dog food 1.00
be good for dogs 0.86
be bad for dogs 0.86
make dogs sick 0.83
be bad for cats 0.80
be used in food restaurants 0.78
be used in fast food restaurants 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pork, is dog food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pork, is dog food)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pork, is dog food)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(dairy product, be bad for cats)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(pork, is dog food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(pork, is dog food)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Plausible(pork, make dogs sick)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(pork, make dogs sick)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(pork, make dogs sick)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Plausible(pork, be bad for cats)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(pork, be bad for cats)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(pork, is dog food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for cats)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(lunch meat, be bad for dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for dogs)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(pork, is dog food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(dairy product, be bad for cats)