pork: be more dangerous than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be more dangerous than beef 1.00
be better than beef 0.94
be worse than beef 0.93
be cheaper than beef 0.91
be healthier than beef 0.90
is other meat 0.83
be called other meat 0.83
be considered meat 0.82
is meat 0.82
be called meat 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(vegetable, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pork, be more dangerous than beef)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(vegetable, is meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, is meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(vegetable, is meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pork, be more dangerous than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beef, be considered meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pork, be more dangerous than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pork, be better than beef)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pork, be considered meat)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pork, be cheaper than beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pork, is meat)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pork, be more dangerous than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vegetable, is meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(pork, be more dangerous than beef) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vegetable, is meat)