pork: be worse than beef

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents meat
Weight: 0.68
, vegetable
Weight: 0.66
, food
Weight: 0.65
, dairy product
Weight: 0.64
, sandwich
Weight: 0.62
Siblings ground beef
Weight: 0.66
, chop
Weight: 0.45
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.38
, meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, beef
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be worse than beef 1.00
be better than beef 0.96
be more dangerous than beef 0.93
be cheaper than beef 0.92
be healthier than beef 0.90
is other meat 0.83
be worst meat eat 0.83
be called other meat 0.82
is meat 0.81
be considered meat 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(vegetable, is meat)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pork, be worse than beef)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(vegetable, is meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(vegetable, is meat)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(beef, be considered meat)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.01
Plausible(vegetable, is meat)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(beef, be considered meat)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(beef, be considered meat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pork, be worse than beef)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(pork, be better than beef)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(pork, be better than beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(pork, be cheaper than beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(pork, be more dangerous than beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(pork, be better than beef)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pork, is meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(pork, be called other meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(pork, be considered meat)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worst meat eat)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(pork, be better than beef)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(pork, be worst meat eat)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(pork, be more dangerous than beef)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(pork, be cheaper than beef)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pork, is meat)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(pork, be considered meat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(pork, be called other meat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(pork, is meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(pork, be called other meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(pork, be considered meat)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(pork, be more dangerous than beef)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(pork, be more dangerous than beef)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(pork, be worst meat eat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be called other meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(pork, be healthier than beef)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(pork, is meat)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(pork, be cheaper than beef)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pork, be considered meat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(pork, be cheaper than beef)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(pork, be worst meat eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pork, be worse than beef)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vegetable, is meat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(beef, be considered meat)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(pork, be worse than beef)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(vegetable, is meat)