preparation: be for hunting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.62
, step
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, duty
Weight: 0.59
, matter
Weight: 0.59
Siblings training
Weight: 0.68
, planning
Weight: 0.62
, mouthwash
Weight: 0.55
, capsule
Weight: 0.54
, baking
Weight: 0.51

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for hunting 1.00
be for hunting important 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(planning, be for hunting important) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(planning, be for hunting important)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(preparation, be for hunting)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting important)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(preparation, be for hunting important)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(preparation, be for hunting important)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(preparation, be for hunting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(preparation, be for hunting) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(planning, be for hunting important)