processor: is zimbabwe

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents central processing unit
Weight: 0.72
, chip
Weight: 0.67
, computer hardware
Weight: 0.66
, unit
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cache
Weight: 0.62
, controller
Weight: 0.60
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.37
, motherboard
Weight: 0.36
, potato chip
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is zimbabwe 1.00
zimbabwe 1.00
be popular in england 0.79
be famous in england 0.79
is british 0.78
kelly hate ryan mathews 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chip, is british) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(processor, is zimbabwe)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(chip, is british)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chip, be popular in england)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chip, be famous in england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(chip, is british)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(chip, is british) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(processor, is zimbabwe)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(processor, zimbabwe)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(processor, zimbabwe)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(processor, zimbabwe)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(processor, zimbabwe)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Salient(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(processor, is zimbabwe)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chip, is british)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chip, is british)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)