chip: be famous in england

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be famous in england 1.00
be popular in england 0.96
is british 0.79
is zimbabwe 0.79
be made in america 0.78
zimbabwe 0.78
be made quality in germany 0.78
is famous 0.77
be seen outside of usa 0.77
be problem in america 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food, is famous)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(product, be made quality in germany)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(product, be made in america)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(product, be made in america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(product, be made quality in germany)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(fast food, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(fast food, is famous)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, be made in america)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(product, be made quality in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(processor, zimbabwe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(fast food, is famous)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(product, be made quality in germany)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(product, be made in america)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chip, be famous in england)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(processor, zimbabwe)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(processor, zimbabwe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chip, be famous in england)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(chip, be popular in england)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chip, be popular in england)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chip, is british)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(chip, is british)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Salient(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(product, be made in america)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(product, be made quality in germany)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(processor, zimbabwe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(product, be made in america)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(product, be made quality in germany)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(fast food, is famous)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Typical(chip, be famous in england)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)