chip: be popular in england

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer hardware
Weight: 0.60
, substrate
Weight: 0.60
, fast food
Weight: 0.60
, product
Weight: 0.58
, snack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings potato chip
Weight: 0.73
, processor
Weight: 0.67
, microprocessor
Weight: 0.65
, cpu
Weight: 0.58
, motherboard
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be popular in england 1.00
be famous in england 0.96
is british 0.79
is zimbabwe 0.79
be made in america 0.78
zimbabwe 0.78
be made quality in germany 0.77
be problem in america 0.77
be seen outside of usa 0.77
be in australia expensive 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(product, be made quality in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(product, be made in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(fast food, be problem in america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(product, be made in america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(product, be made quality in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be problem in america)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(product, be made in america)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(product, be made quality in germany)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(processor, zimbabwe)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(product, be made quality in germany) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chip, be popular in england)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(product, be made in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chip, be popular in england)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(fast food, be problem in america) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(chip, be popular in england)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(processor, is zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(processor, zimbabwe) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(processor, zimbabwe)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(chip, be popular in england)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(chip, be famous in england)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(chip, be famous in england)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(chip, be famous in england)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chip, be famous in england)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(chip, is british)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(chip, be popular in england)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(product, be made in america)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(product, be made quality in germany)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(processor, is zimbabwe)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(processor, zimbabwe)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(product, be made in america)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(fast food, be problem in america)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(chip, be popular in england) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(product, be made quality in germany)