professional: be subject to strict codes

Property	Similarity
be subject to strict codes	1.00
be subject to strict codes of conduct	0.97
be subject to codes	0.94
be subject to codes of conduct	0.91
have code	0.81
need code	0.80
need code of ethics	0.78
have code of ethics	0.78

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(professional, need code)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(professional, need code of ethics)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(professional, have code)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Typical(professional, be subject to codes)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(professional, have code of ethics)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Plausible(professional, need code)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.42

¬ Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(professional, be subject to codes)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Salient(professional, be subject to codes)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(professional, have code)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(professional, need code of ethics)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(professional, have code of ethics)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.42

Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(professional, have code)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Salient(professional, need code)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(professional, be subject to codes)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Plausible(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes of conduct)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Salient(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(professional, need code of ethics)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.21

Salient(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(professional, have code of ethics)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(professional, have code)

0.23

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(professional, be subject to codes of conduct)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.80

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(professional, need code)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(professional, be subject to strict codes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(professional, need code of ethics)

Parents	graduate student Weight: 0.61 , customer Weight: 0.58 , third party Weight: 0.56 , expert Weight: 0.55
Siblings	staff Weight: 0.67 , team Weight: 0.65 , realtor Weight: 0.64 , entrepreneur Weight: 0.62 , counselor Weight: 0.62

professional: be subject to strict codes

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings