professional: deal with ethical issues

Property	Similarity
deal with ethical issues	1.00
deal with ethics issues	0.94
deal with ethical issues of plagiarism	0.89
deal with ethics issues on plagiarism	0.85
is ethics	0.78
need code of ethics	0.76
have code of ethics	0.76

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.02

¬ Typical(professional, is ethics)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(professional, deal with ethical issues of plagiarism)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Typical(professional, need code of ethics)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(professional, have code of ethics)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(professional, is ethics)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(professional, deal with ethical issues of plagiarism)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Plausible(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(professional, need code of ethics)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Plausible(professional, deal with ethical issues of plagiarism)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(professional, deal with ethical issues of plagiarism)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Plausible(professional, have code of ethics)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Salient(professional, is ethics)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.59

Plausible(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.68

Typical(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Typical(professional, deal with ethics issues on plagiarism)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Remarkable(professional, deal with ethics issues)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(professional, need code of ethics)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.61

Salient(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Salient(professional, have code of ethics)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(professional, is ethics)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(professional, have code of ethics)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Remarkable(professional, deal with ethical issues) ⋁

Evidence: 0.97

¬ Remarkable(professional, need code of ethics)

Parents	graduate student Weight: 0.61 , customer Weight: 0.58 , third party Weight: 0.56 , expert Weight: 0.55
Siblings	staff Weight: 0.67 , team Weight: 0.65 , realtor Weight: 0.64 , entrepreneur Weight: 0.62 , counselor Weight: 0.62

professional: deal with ethical issues

Related concepts

Related properties

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

Salient implies Plausible

Similarity expansion

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

Typical implies Plausible

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings