programming: is confusing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer science
Weight: 0.61
, operation
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.57
Siblings computer programming
Weight: 0.71
, tv show
Weight: 0.64
, comedy
Weight: 0.62
, broadcast
Weight: 0.55
, programming language
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
is confusing 1.00
is complicated 0.83
is overcomplicated 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(programming language, is complicated)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(programming language, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(programming language, is complicated)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(computer programming, is complicated) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(computer programming, is complicated)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(programming, is confusing)

Similarity expansion

0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Typical(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(programming, is complicated)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(programming, is complicated)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(programming, is complicated)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(programming, is complicated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(programming, is confusing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(programming, is confusing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(programming language, is complicated)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(programming, is confusing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(computer programming, is complicated)